Today, the SFMS and CMA joined the AMA and dozens of other health care organizations in filing an amicus brief with the US Supreme Court challenging California’s Proposition 8, which denies state recognition of same-sex marriages. Tomorrow, a similar brief will be submitted challenging the Defense of Marriage Act, which denies benefits to same-sex partners of federal employees.
“CMA strongly supports efforts to reduce health care disparities among members of same sex households, including measures to afford such households equal rights and privileges to health care, health insurance and survivor benefits,” said CMA President Paul Phinney, MD. “We also recognize that denying civil marriage contributes to worse health outcomes for gay and lesbian individuals, couples and their families.”
The brief states that the listed Amici—which includes leading associations of psychological, psychiatric, medical and social work professionals— have sought to present an accurate and responsible summary of the current scientific and professional knowledge concerning sexual orientation and families relevant to this case.
These briefs were filed based on policy passed at last year’s House of Delegates:
Date Adopted: 10/15/2012 Status: Adopted
For a full copy of the Perry brief, please click here.
This week, the court ruled that California Department of Health Care Services violated disclosure law in 2011 by refusing to provide background information on proposed Medi-Cal payment cuts with the California Medical Association (CMA).
The official signed judgment states that “documents exchanged between DHCS and the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services… are not subject to the deliberative process privilege claimed by DHCS.” The court also ruled that “the relationship between DHCS and CMS is fundamentally different from that involved in cases which have recognized a deliberative process privilege and any benefit derived from keeping discussions confidential is substantially diminished in this context.” The court ordered DHCS to release the documents that it gave to federal officials. The state has 20 days to appeal the decision or ask for additional time to explain why the documents should not be disclosed.