HIPAA and Physician Accountability
Kathleen Unger, MD
This article begins an occasional series on the impact of the
Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Originally
conceived
as one article, the topic proved to be too big and too important
to our
members for superficial coverage.
The "Portability" in the title harkens to one of its
origins-addressing
the problem of workers who lose their health insurance coverage
when they
change jobs. The act has now vastly increased in scope. HIPPA is
intended
to improve the efficiency of our health care system in this
electronic
age, as well as improve the confidentiality of electronically
written
individually identifiable health care information
(italics mine).
Though far from complete at this writing, some implications are
clearly
apparent:
- The new regulations will almost certainly apply to you,
even if your
own medical practice is not computerized. Medical information
either
already is, or will become, "electronic" when it leaves your
office.
As attempts to sort out if hard copy information ever was in
electronic
form will prove too burdensome, regarding all such information
as electronic
is the logical approach.
- HIPAA is going to change how we render medical care in the
U.S. in
major, expensive, unfathomable ways (not all the software, let
alone
the regulations have been written yet).
- It is huge. There are already 1,500 pages of incomplete
regulations
in the Federal Register. (Your current PDR has 3,506 pages).
- It is unavoidable-a virtual juggernaut.
- It does not take effect until the final-not
draft-regulations go through
the public comment phase. The current target date of October
2002, is
almost certainly much too soon an estimate. F. Implementing
the "rules"
is going to cost our health care system-as well as practicing
physicians-considerable
time and money.
- It is going to spawn at least one entire new industry
(medical information
"clearinghouses" which convert medical information into the
HIPAA format.
- It is not too soon to begin the task of learning what you
need to
know.
The Origins
HIPAA is the child of the electronic age. As large mainframe
computers
gave way to the PC in the early 1980s, computer terminals became
common
in medical offices. Software developers were quick to write
programs customized
for medical uses and we became somewhat adept at using them.
Hospitals
began using terminals to make lab test results instantly
available. Then,
the writing of inpatient admission and treatment plan orders via
computer
was something we all had to learn.
Outpatient medical care remained a quagmire; different health
insurance
forms, different information requirements, endless phone calls
to ascertain
patient eligibility, co-payment responsibility, etc, etc.
By 1990, health care industry leaders were asking Congress to
pass legislation
to require the streamlining and standardizing of the healthcare
payment
process and to make these standards mandatory. Six long years
later, the
result was the Kennedy-Kasselbaum Bill, or HIPAA, which
President Clinton
signed into law on August 21, 1996.
While Congress retained the right to pass laws regulating how
healthcare
information is handled, the very slowness of the bicameral
process has
triggered a shifting of the responsibility. Rather than
Congress, the
Department of Health and Human Services has taken over the
process of
writing the regulations that detail how to implement the
provisions of
the Kennedy-Kasselbaum Bill.
Four Sections
The HIPAA of 1996 can be divided into four parts:
I. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) One uniform system of
recording
health-related information, used nationwide, with specific rules
as to
the use, storage and transmission of what is very broadly
defined as electronic
health care information-and it almost all originates as or
becomes electronic.
It will affect physicians, hospitals, insurance companies,
health plans,
billing services, computer software, pharmacies, etc.
II. A System of Unique Identifiers In order to facilitate
information
exchange among various health facilities nationwide, this
includes
A. A unique, ten unit, National Provider Identifier (NPI)
alpha-numeric
code-something like # SQ37H42DA9-for each and every physician in
the country.
This will be maintained by a National Provider File containing
detailed
information on each physician.
B. A similar unique identifier will be given to every local
pharmacy,
durable medical equipment sales and rental business, hospital,
health
maintenance plan, preferred provider organization, health
insurance company,
outpatient physical or occupational therapy program, etc.
C. A Unique Health Care Identifier (UHID) will be assigned to
every single
person in the nation-either at birth, or retroactively. This
provision
is so controversial that it has been put on indefinite hold and
will probably
delay yet again the October 2002 implementation date.
All of the abuses and misuses of our nation's other system of
unique
identifiers for individuals-Social Security Numbers-are of
concern. This
electronic era has the potential to multiply them exponentially.
The concept
that works so well for animals-yes, the grain-of-rice-sized
unique identifiers
that are injected into the dorsal neck fold of newborn kittens,
puppies
and livestock, takes on 1984-like aspects when applied to you
and me.
The technology for humans has been around for some time. I note
that the
Norplant Intradermal Contraceptive System has been in use
worldwide for
a couple of decades.
III. Electronic Signatures: The far-from-finalized standards
must accomplish
the following:
A. Identify the signatory individual,
B. Assure the integrity of the transmitted document's content
and provide
evidence that will make it difficult (but not impossible) for
the signer
to claim that the electronic document is not valid. This will
require
a cryptographically-based digital signature, as well as
authentication/identification
procedures. We have obviously come a long, long way from
Medicare's soon
to be outdated policy statement to the effect that the Internet
was not
secure enough to be used to transmit sensitive data.
IV. Protection of Individually Identifiable Health Care
Information.
This provision of HIPAA will forever change the way that
sensitive healthcare
information is handled. It turns traditional ideas of
confidentiality
upside down. At present, it contains incompatibilities with
state laws,
massive loopholes in the arenas of law enforcement, marketing of
health
care products, nonprofit fundraising, public health concerns and
persons
who fill out online questionnaires in order to obtain
information relevant
to themselves in health-promoting websites.
It places massive new duties for monitoring other business
entities on
physicians. This includes obtaining information from your
Internet service
provider (AOL, Yahoo, etc) that is kept secret by them due to
security
and business concerns. As this last section of the HIPAA
legislation is
probably the furthest from its final form, it will be dealt with
last.
Watch for upcoming issues for HIPAA Part II: Electronic Data
Interchange.
|